Legal Opinion

Metzgar v. Rodgers

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 5, 2003No. CA 02-1081PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Neal, Judge.

This is a will-contest case involving the disposition of the estate of Hurley Nash, who died on January 13, 2000. A holographic will that Mr. Nash wrote in 1994 was admitted to probate. This will, however, lacked a residuary clause; this lawsuit is between several of Mr. Nash’s intestate heirs and some of the named beneficiaries. Appellants Kathleen Metzgar, Sue Yow, Betty Sturch, Joe Fleece, and the Estate of William D. Fleece are intestate heirs of Mr. Nash. Appellees Charles Rodgers, Marty Krutchen, Martha Williams, Roy Seaton, Nora Seaton, and Chuck Smith are beneficiaries of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. AKA v. Jefferson Hosp. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Cates v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Webb v. WebbSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  4. Wells v. Estate of WellsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Cross v. ManningSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Campbell v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Dale v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  3. Cleaves v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Miller v. Hometown Propane Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Abdin v. AbdinCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API