Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Findlay v. Florida East Coast Ry. Co.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided April 29, 1933No. 758PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STRUM, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity, the purpose of which is to procure a construction by this court of item No. 9 of the will of Mary Lilly (Flagler) Bingham, deceased, and to compel the application of the residuary trust fund created by said will, hereinafter mentioned, in financial aid of Florida East Coast Railway Company for the benefit of its creditors.

The bill of complaint, in effect, alleges that, upon the death in 1913 of Henry M. Flagler, the founder of the railway and hotel companies hereinafter mentioned, his wife, Mary Lilly Flagler, as principal beneficiary under her…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. In Re TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Findlay v. Florida East Coast Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API