Legal Opinion

State v. Gilbert

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1987No. 8610SC1030PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

The trial court made findings that several of defendant’s statutory rights were violated by the magistrate. Those findings must be affirmed on appeal if there is evidence to support them. See State v. Bright, 301 N.C. 243, 271 S.E. 2d 368 (1980) (findings of fact supported by competent evidence are binding on appeal). While an examination of the record reveals ample evidence to support the finding that defendant’s statutory rights were violated, on this record we see no basis for the court’s conclusion that defendant’s constitutional rights were violated. In addition, we hold…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. BrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. ShaddingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. CurmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. LabinskiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. EliasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. ShellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. HaasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API