Legal Opinion

Stoll v. Griffith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1905No. 5721PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Irwin, J., entered January 3, 1905, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury¿ in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtEudkiit, J.

On June 8, 1898, a final receiver’s receipt issued to, the heirs of George M. Mutchler, deceased, for the N. E'. % of Sec. 10, Tp. 25, N., E. 42, E., W. M. On the 16th day of November, 1898, this receipt was followed by a patent from the United States to the same parties for the same land. On the 14th day of October, 1898, Henry G. Mutchler, Katie Bittner, and Elora E. Wolcott, claiming to be all the heirs of George M. Mutchler, deceased, conveyed said premises by warranty deed to Emil Coulon. Henry G. Mutchler signed this deed in his own behalf, and as attorney in fact for the other…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Williams v. PittockWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Sands v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Oswald v. WolfIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Rowland v. EskelandWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Wright v. SperryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kahn v. ThorpeWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Dwight v. WaldronWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Burgess v. PethWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Wright v. JessupWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Smith v. BorradaileNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API