Sands v. Davis
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Manistee. Ejectment. The facts are in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.
Defendant in error in her own right and as assignee of her brother, as heirs at law of Joseph Smith, recovered judgment against Sands for one undivided fifth of certain premises in Manistee county, being lot 1 in section 7, town 21 north of range 16 west, except a parcel held by a third person. Joseph Smith was original purchaser from the United States by patent dated March 10, 1852. He died in 1858 leaving four children, Nancy B. Bagley, Luther Gr. Smith, Y. Adelaide Sherwood, and Augustus E. Smith, and two grandchil*16dren, Lilias I. Ford, now Lilias I. Davis, and George A. E. Ford. George A.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blight's Lessee v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Watkins v. Lessee of HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Willison v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts v. Town of PawletSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Jackson Ex Dem. Bradstreet v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Elder v. McClaskeyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Defreese v. LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Cecil v. ClarkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
- Campau v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Hodgson v. Federal Oil & Development Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.