Legal Opinion

Donahue v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 22, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

Joseph Donahue (Claimant) petitions for review of an adjudication of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) refusing to reinstate Claimant’s suspended benefits or to impose penalties on Claimant’s employer for suspending benefits. In so adjudicating, the Board affirmed the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) that the suspension was appropriate because otherwise Claimant would have been compensated at a higher level than employees doing the work he was doing at the time of his injury.

On December 19, 1999, Claimant sustained a left shoulder and lower…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Frowen v. BlankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Moser v. DeSettaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Thomas v. SEAMANSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Suber v. Pennsylvania Commission on Crime & DelinquencyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Kraeuter v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. County of Lackawanna v. Verrastro, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2009
  4. Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. J. May v. Dana Corporation (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API