Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. McArthur v. Rundle

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 15, 1968No. 17021PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

KALODNER, Circuit Judge.

The District Court entered an Order granting William McArthur’s petition for a Writ of habeas corpus on its finding that evidence adduced at his state court trial was the product of an unlawful search and seizure in violation of his federal constitutional rights.1 This appeal by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania followed.

A three-count indictment was returned against McArthur at the March, 1965 term of the Court of Quarter Sessions, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania; Count I charged him with burglary; Count II with larceny and Count III with receiving…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. LopezDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971
  3. United States of America Ex Rel. Albert B. Crosby v. Joseph R. Brierley, Superintendent, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. PinnoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. United States v. Richard DayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API