Legal Opinion

United States of America Ex Rel. Albert B. Crosby v. Joseph R. Brierley, Superintendent, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 9, 1968No. 17044PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding in which relator attacks his plea of guilty to two murder indictments in a state court. He was represented by private counsel when the pleas were entered to two bills of indictment for murder. In response to the court crier’s inquiry, “How plead you, guilty or not guilty?”, relator answered, “Guilty generally”. The question of the validity of that plea is now before us. A three-judge court conducted a hearing on the plea under Pennsylvania law and procedure to determine the degree of guilt; after a seventy-minute…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Smith v. O'GRADYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ZuberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Raymond S. Berry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  3. Commonwealth v. RoundtreeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Commonwealth v. SlavikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Robert Woodward, A/K/A Robert Woodard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API