Legal Opinion
Weltover, Inc. v. Republic of Argentina
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 3, 1991No. 89 Civ. 6926 (JES)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Weltover, Inc. (“Weltover”), Springdale Enterprises, Inc. (“Springdale”), and Bank Cantrade, A.G. (“Bank Can-trade”), bring this action against the Republic of Argentina (“Argentina”) and Ban-co Central De La República Argentina (“Banco Central”) alleging that the defendants have breached obligations arising out of the issuance of certain bonds. The defendants move to dismiss the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and lack of personal jurisdiction or, in the alternative, pursuant to the doctrine of forum non conveniens. For the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Antares Aircraft, L.P. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, and Nigerian Airports AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Weltover, Inc. Springdale Enterprises, Inc. Bank Cantrade, A.G. v. Republic of Argentina Banco Central De La ArgentinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Presbyterian Church of Sudan v. Talisman Energy, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.