Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Wolters

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1991No. 18271Published

1Opinion of the Court

807 P.2d 633 (1991)

119 Idaho 415

Greg J. FULLER and James C. Meservy, dba Fuller & Meservy, Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants-Appellants-Cross Respondents,

v.

Martin WOLTERS and Doris Wolters, husband and wife, Defendants-Counterclaimants-Respondents-Cross Appellants.

Martin WOLTERS and Doris Wolters, husband and wife, Third Party Plaintiffs-Respondents-Cross Appellants,

v.

Daniel L. MINK, Third Party Defendant-Appellant-Cross Respondent.

No. 18271.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, October 1990 Term.

March 11, 1991.

Benoit, Alexander, Sinclair, Doerr, Harwood & High, Twin Falls, for plaintiffs-appellants.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Anderson v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Big Butte Ranch, Inc. v. GrasmickIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Griggs v. NashIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Hodge v. BordenIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API