Legal Opinion

In Re MacKenzie

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1935No. 6233PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a proceeding by respondent to recover compensation for the death of her husband, Niel MacKenzie, under the Workmen's Compensation Act, and is now before this court on a second appeal.

The matter was first heard before the State Industrial Accident Board, which board found in favor of and made an award to respondent, December 28, 1932. An appeal was taken to the district court, and from a judgment of that court, affirming the award of the Accident Board, the first appeal was taken. (In re MacKenzie, 54 Idaho 481, 33 P.2d 113.)

Upon that appeal, this court held that there was but one real…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Burchett v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Zeier v. Boise Transfer Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Murdoch v. Humes SwanstromIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Joyce Bros. v. StanfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  5. In Re MacKenzieIdaho Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pierstorff v. Gray's Auto ShopIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Todd L. Hamilton v. Alpha Services, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Skeen v. Sunshine Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Evans v. Continental Life and Accident CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Neale v. WeaverIdaho Supreme Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API