Legal Opinion

Mulcahy v. Young

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1922No. Civ. No. 2494PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent to settle a bill of exceptions in the ease of Pioneer Fruit Company, a corporation, as plaintiff, against the petitioner herein, as defendant.

The petition states that the said fruit company, on the twelfth day of January, 1920, commenced an action in the superior court of said county of San Joaquin against James Mulcahy, the petitioner herein, to recover the sum of $705.18; that, upon issue being joined in said action by the filing of answer to the complaint by said Mulcahy, the cause was tried before the court, sitting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Churchill v. FlournoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Kramm v. Stockton Electric R. R. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Horton v. JackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Patrick v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harrison v. HarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Silverman v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Woodard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Pioneer Fruit Co. v. MulcahyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API