Legal Opinion

Woodard v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 2, 1926No. Docket No. 5273PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Mandate. In this proceeding petitioner seeks an order directing the respondent Superior Court and a judge thereof to settle a bill of exceptions.

It is conceded that the proposed bill of exceptions was not served within the time allowed by law, and that the determining question is whether there was a waiver of that fact.

Stripped of all unnecessary detail, it appears that the plaintiff in the action presented to the defendant therein, but not within the time prescribed by law, a proposed bill of exceptions; that thereupon the defendant presented to the plaintiff and filed with the clerk of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hicks v. MastenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Bollinger v. BollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Mulcahy v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Howell v. PedersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Silverman v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API