Woodard v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
Mandate. In this proceeding petitioner seeks an order directing the respondent Superior Court and a judge thereof to settle a bill of exceptions.
It is conceded that the proposed bill of exceptions was not served within the time allowed by law, and that the determining question is whether there was a waiver of that fact.
Stripped of all unnecessary detail, it appears that the plaintiff in the action presented to the defendant therein, but not within the time prescribed by law, a proposed bill of exceptions; that thereupon the defendant presented to the plaintiff and filed with the clerk of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hicks v. MastenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Bollinger v. BollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Mulcahy v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Howell v. PedersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Silverman v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by1 opinion
- Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937