Legal Opinion
In Re Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 2, 2006No. 99CV0151-L(NLS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT
LORENZ, District Judge.
This matter came on regularly for a hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Third Consolidated Amended Complaint (“TAC”). Patrick J. Coughlin and Tor Gronborg of Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP appeared for the Plaintiffs. William F. Sullivan of Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker appeared for the Defendants.
Having carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs, oral argument, and applicable law, the Court finds the TAC’s allegations regarding Albuterol Spiros…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Take-Two Interactive Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- In Re Countrywide Financial Corporation Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
- In Re Motorola Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- In Re Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
- In Re Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.