Legal Opinion

Cleo, Inc. v. United State

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 31, 2006No. Consol. Court 05-00336Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARZILAY, Judge:

This action is before the court on Plaintiffs’ motions for judgment on the agency record pursuant to USCIT Rule 56.2. The parties contest a final material injury determination issued by an evenly divided United States International Trade Commission (“ITC” or “Commission”), which found an industry in the United States materially injured by reason of imports of certain tissue paper products from the People’s Republic of China (“China”) already determined by the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) to have been sold at less than fair value (“LTFV”) in the United States. The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
United States Steel Group--A Unit of Usx Corporation Ak Steel Corporation Bethlehem Steel Corporation Inland Steel Industries, Inc. Ltv Steel Company, Inc. And National Steel Corporation and Geneva Steel Gulf States Steel, Inc. Of Alabama Laclede Steel Company Wci Steel, Inc. And Sharon Steel Corporation v. The United States, and Kawasaki Steel Corporation Nkk Corporation Kobe Steel, Ltd. Nippon Steel Corporation Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. And Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd., and Usinas Siderurgicas De Minas Gerias, S.A., and Companhia Siderurgica Nacional, and Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., and Dofasco, Inc., and Uss-Posco Industries, and Ipsco, Inc., and Preussag Stahl Ag Klockner Stahl Gmbh Krupp-Hoesch Stahl Ag Friedrich Krupp Ag Hoesch-Krupp and Thyssen Stahl Ag and Stelco, Inc., and Hoogovens Groep Bv and N.V.W. (u.s.a.), Inc., and Usinor Sacilor and Sollac, and Algoma Steel Inc., and Sidmar N v. And Tradearbed, Inc., Kern-Liebers Usa, Inc., and Bethlehem Steel Corporation Ak Steel Corporation Inland Steel Industries, Inc. Ltv Steel Company, Inc. National Steel Corporation and United States Steel Group--A Unit of Usx Corporation, and Gulf States Steel, Inc. Of Alabama Wci Steel, Inc. And Sharon Steel Corporation v. The United States, and Kawasaki Steel Corporation Kobe Steel, Ltd. Nkk Corporation Nippon Steel Corporation Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. And Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd., and Usinas Siderurgicas De Minas Gerias, S.A., and Sidbec-Dosco, Inc., and Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. Pohang Coated Steel Co., Ltd. Pohang Steel Industries Co., Ltd. And Union Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Companhia Siderurgica Nacional, and Voest Alpine Stahl Ag, and Ilva, S.P.A., and Siderar S.A.I.C., the Successor of Propulsora Siderurgica S.A.I.C. And Aceros Parana, S.A.I.C., and Stelco, Inc., and Dofasco, Inc., and Sidmar N v. And Tradearbed, Inc., and Usinor Sacilor and Sollac, and Empresa Nacional Siderurgica, S.A. And Algoma Steel Inc., and Worthington Industries, Inc. Ilva Usa, Inc. And Krupp Steel Products, Inc. v. Thyssen Stahl Ag Thyssen Steel Detroit Co. Thyssen Inc. Preussag Stahl Ag Klockner Stahl Gmbh Friedrich Krupp Ag Hoesch-Krupp and Krupp-Hoesch Stahl Ag, Defendants/cross-Appellants, and Hoogovens Groep Bv and N.V.W. (u.s.a.), Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.