Legal Opinion

Roman v. Abrams

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 15, 1985No. 85 Civ. 0763-CLBPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRIEANT, District Judge.

On December 4th of last year, breaking with long standing precedent, the Second Circuit, in McCray v. Abrams, 750 F.2d 1113 (2d Cir.1984), rehearing en banc den., 756. F.2d 277 (2d Cir.1985), petition for cert. filed, 756 F.2d 277, “spell[ed] the end of the peremptory challenge as an effective jury selection tool,” in state criminal trials (Meskill, J., dissenting). The Court held that: “[T]he Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of trial by an impartial jury ... forbids the exercise of [peremptory] challenges to excuse jurors solely on the basis of their…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Roman v. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. Fields v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. United States v. Eugene LeslieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. GrandisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API