Legal Opinion
Herman E. Sayger, Tr/as Sayger Broadcasting Company v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 13, 1962No. 16956PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Alleging that the Commission arbitrarily refused to waive its ten per cent interference rule 1 in denying its applica tion for a new full-time standard broadcast station to be located at Tiffin, Ohio, appellant asks reversal of the Commission’s order. We find there is substantial evidence in the record viewed as a whole to support the Commission’s action. 2
Whenever two or more radio stations operate simultaneously on the same or closely adjacent frequencies, depending on such factors as distance between and power of the stations, there will be interference in varying…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Seatrain Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Tomah-Mauston Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, John D. Rice, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- West Michigan Telecasters, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Bcu-Tv, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Deep South Broadcasting Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Triple C Broadcasting Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Chambersburg Broadcasting Company v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Deep South Broadcasting Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Triple C Broadcasting Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965