Chambersburg Broadcasting Company v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DANAHER, Circuit Judge:
This appellant is licensee of a Class II station, WCHA, which operates on 800 kc, 1 kw, daytime only in Chambersburg, Pennsylvania. WCHA applied for a construction permit to increase its power to 5 kw. 1 Rejecting the recommendation of the Commission’s Hearing Examiner 2 while substantially adopting his findings of fact, the Review Board concluded that WCHA had failed to justify a waiver of the 10 per cent rule. Its decision released August 24, 1965, was made the subject of limited review after which the Commission on December 17, 1965 released its Memorandum Opinion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Lorain Journal Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Elyria-Lorain Broadcasting Company, Intervenor. W.W.I.Z., Inc., and Sanford A. Schafitz v. Federal Communications Commission, Elyria-Lorain Broadcasting Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Daniel F. Guinan, D/B/A Guinan Realty Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Louis Adelman, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Interstate Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, E. Weaks McKinney IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- James S. Rivers, Inc., (Wjaz) v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Sunshine State Broadcasting Company, Inc. (Wbrd) v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wste-Tv, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Puerto Rico Broadcasting, Inc., InvervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977