Legal Opinion
United States v. Ulice Askew
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 5, 2005No. 03-2574PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
Ulice Askew challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 846 for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute PCP. He argues that the only credible evidence against him established one PCP spot purchase amounting to a buyer-seller relationship only, not a conspiracy. Relatedly, Askew argues that the district judge committed plain error by failing to supply the jury with a buyer-seller instruction. He also asserts that the judge failed to answer appropriately the jury’s questions during deliberations about the conspiracy count.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Holmes v. Village of Hoffman EstatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Stuart RommCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. BullockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Salvador Castro-JuarezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Fausto LopezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.