Legal Opinion
Quinn v. West
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided March 19, 2001No. 6:99-cv-00294PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WALTER S. SMITH, Jr., District Judge.
This is an employment retaliation case brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and the Whistleblower Protection Act, 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8)(A) (‘WPA”). Defendant contends that he is entitled to summary judgment because Plaintiff cannot meet his initial burden to establish a prima facie case of retaliation under Title VII. Defendant also contends that Plaintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with regard to his whistleblower claim. Plaintiff responds by…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Greenhouse v. GerenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Bindhu A. Poovannumvila v. Doug Collins, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2026