Legal Opinion

National Builders Bureau v. Chickasaw Lbr. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 17, 1928No. 17757PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

Plaintiff in error, as plaintiff below, commenced this action to recover on a promissory note in the sum of $350. The defendant admitted execution and delivery of the note, but defended on the grounds of a rescission of the contract upon which the note was based and maintained that defendant was entitled to rescind the contract for plaintiff had failed to furnish supplies within a reasonable time provided for in the contract, and that plaintiff had failed to fulfill a part of the contract (in parol) wherein plaintiff agreed to furnish a person to acquaint defendant with the service considered…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. BodovitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Holmes v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Carlson v. Stone-Ordean-Wells Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Rawlings v. UferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Putnam City Co. v. Minnetonka Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wichita Flour Mills Co. v. Guymon Equity ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Malernee v. DriebelbisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Seidenbach's v. OliverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Hummer v. Henryetta State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Eales v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API