Johnson Oil Refining Co. v. State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Mitchell, County Attorney (Three Cases)
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes
delivered the opinion of the Court..
These cases present the question of the validity of property taxes laid in Pawnee County, Oklahoma, under the state statute, upon the entire fleet of appellant’s tank cars. The challenge in each case was under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Federal Constitution upon the ground that the cars did not have their situs within the State and hence that the State had no jurisdiction to tax them. The taxes in Nos. 22 and 23 were on 380 cars for the years 1925 to 1928; in No. 24, on 381 cars for the year 1931. The assessments in Nos. 22…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Frick v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Johnson Oil Refining Co. v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Brock & Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- In Re the Assessment of Personal Property Taxes Against Missouri Gas EnergySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.