Legal Opinion
Daniel Francis Carey v. Continental Airlines, Inc. And Gary C. Gilbert
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 15, 1987No. 85-2305PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.8(c) and 27.1.-2. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff, Daniel Francis Carey, brought this action arising from Carey’s arrest for trespassing against defendants, Continental Airlines and its employee Gary C. Gilbert, alleging violation of civil rights protected by 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and asserting several…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Kenneth E. Sutton, Jr. v. Providence St. Joseph Medical Center, a California Non-Profit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Daniel J. Roche Et Ux. Valerie Roche v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Gallagher v. Neil Young Freedom ConcertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Schaffer v. Salt Lake City CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Alexis v. McDonald's Restaurants of Massachusetts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.