Legal Opinion
Papendick v. Bosch
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided June 20, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LONGOBARDI, Judge.
This the Court’s decision on the motion of the Defendant Robert Bosch Gmbh (“RB”) to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction.
Plaintiff Helmut Papendick (“Papen-dick”), a West German citizen permanently residing in Maryland, brought suit against RB and Robert Bosch North American, Inc. (“RBNA”) to recover the finders fee he claims that they owe him in connection with the purchase by RBNA of two million shares of Borg-Warner common stock. RB is a West German corporation with its principal place of business in West Germany while RBNA, a wholly owned 1 subsidiary of RB,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Sands v. Lefcourt Realty CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
- Blaustein v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Papendick v. Robert Bosch GmbHSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Boston VLCC Tankers, Inc. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1980
- Istituto Bancario Italiano SpA v. Hunter Engineering Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1981
- Terramar Retail Centers, LLC v. Marion 2 Seaport Trust U/A/D/ June 21, 2002Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2017