Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Woel

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 26, 1984No. 111, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

This case involves an interpretation of one of the requirements of the Health Care Malpractice Claims Act, Maryland Code (1984 Repl.Vol.), §§ 3-2A-01 through 3-2A-09 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article. The issue is whether filing a medical malpractice claim with the Director of the Health Claims Arbitration Office, as required by § 3-2A-04 of the Act, and subsequently attending but declining to present evidence at or participate in an arbitration proceeding before a panel selected in accordance with § 3-2A-04, satisfies the statute’s condition precedent to filing a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Oxtoby v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  3. McCormick v. St. Francis De Sales ChurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  4. Kindley v. Governor of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Morris v. Howard Research & Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Houghton v. County Comm'rs of Kent Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Blandon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Comptroller of the Treasury v. Fairchild Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Houghton v. COUNTY COM'RS OF KENT CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. State v. Intercontinental, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API