State v. Morgan, 06ap-620 (4-10-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Floyd B. Morgan, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas finding him guilty of importuning in violation of R.C. 2907.07, a felony of the fifth degree. Defendant assigns three errors:
FIRST ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR
THE CONVICTION SHOULD BE REVERSED BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE CHARGE WAS INSUFFICIENT AS A MATTER OF LAW.
SECOND ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR
BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE SHOWED THAT APPELLANT CONSISTENTLY REAFFIRMED THAT HE ONLY WANTED TO MEET VMELESA AS "FRIENDS," THE CONVICTION SHOULD BE REVERSED AS AGAINST THE MANIFEST WEIGHT OF THE…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. SaxonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Ohio Contract Carriers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- State v. HaydenOhio Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gmac v. Greene, 08ap-295 (9-4-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Dudley, 06ap-1272 (2-5-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Christian, 08ap-170 (12-4-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008