Legal Opinion

State v. Lehman

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 30, 1999PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.

[¶ 1] Peter Lehman appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Cole, J.) on his conditional guilty plea to fifty-one counts of sexual exploitation of a minor, 17 M.R.S.A. § 2922 (1983 & Supp.1998), and one count of sexual abuse of a minor, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 254(1) (Supp.1998). Lehman argues that the Superior Court erred when it denied his motion to suppress because the search warrant was unconstitutionally broad in permitting a search of “all computer equipment and computer-related equipment.” We disagree and affirm the judgment.

I.'

[¶2] In September 1997, a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott Douglas LACY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Richard J. Leary, and F.L. Kleinberg & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. UphamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. LayneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. RabonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  2. State v. SamsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  3. State v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  5. State of Maine v. Jared D. JandreauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API