Legal Opinion

Aragon v. Empire Gold Mining & Milling Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1943No. 4743PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKLEY,’ Justice.

This is a suit in equity wherein the plaintiffs (defendants in error) as successors in interest of the Empire Gold Mining & Milling Company, seek to prevent defendant (plaintiff in error) Edward D. Tittmann from redeeming a junior tax sale certificate; for the cancellation of the tax sale certificate held by said Tittmann, and that defendant Aragon, the Treasurer of Sierra County, be enjoined from issuing a tax deed upon the certificate held by Tittmann.

The case is here upon writ of error sued out by plaintiff in error Tittmann.

The defendants in error have filed no brief and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Homestead Company v. Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Philadelphia v. Heinel Motors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Wilkes v. DaviesWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Boggess v. ScottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Penn v. ClemansSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bailey v. BarrancaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
  2. De Baca v. PereaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Taylor v. ShawNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Worman v. Echo Ridge Homes Cooperative, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Czarnikow-Rionda Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API