Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Barranca
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1971No. 9170PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
Defendants-appellants Perea (Perea) appeal from an adverse judgment in an ejectment action brought by plaintiffs-appellees (Bailey).
This case has a rather complex and tangled factual, administrative and legal history which can best be stated in chronological order.
Mr. Bailey joined the army reserve in 1931 and in 1942 was called to active duty. He made the army his career, during the course of which he was for a time stationed in Albuquerque. He acquired a residence there in 1953 as to which there have been no problems in regard to taxes. He regularly claimed his…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boone v. LightnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Le Maistre v. LeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Martinez v. MundyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
- Alamogordo Improvement Co. v. HennesseeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
- Hood v. BondNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Conroy v. AniskoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Klineline v. BlackhurstNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Cano v. LovatoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Syzemore v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- N. B. Pannell, Jr. v. Continental Can Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.