Legal Opinion

People v. Kendrick

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 3, 2017No. Supreme Court Case 17SA14PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabriel

¶ 1 Prosecutors from the District Attorney’s Office for the Fourth Judicial District (the “District Attorney”) twice brought the defendant, Maurice Dee Kendrick, to trial on numerous charges related to allegations that he threatened several women with a gun and then fired the gun at two occupied houses. Each trial ended in a mistrial, and after ordering the second mistrial, the district court found, pursuant to section 20-1-107(2), C.R.S. (2016), that “special circumstances” rendered it unlikely that Kendrick would receive a fair trial if he were again tried by the District Attorney.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. People v. NullSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  3. United States v. (Under Seal), in Re Grand Jury Proceedings John Doe 462Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. CrossgroveSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  5. People v. PalomoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. ArellanoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  2. v. KentSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  3. People v. EppsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  4. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff v. Jorge SOLIS, DefendantSupreme Court of Colorado · 2022
  5. The People of the State of Colorado v. Jorge Solis.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API