Legal Opinion

Chicago Union Traction Co. v. O'Brien

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 28, 1904No. Gen. No. 11,577PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action on the case for personal injuries. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elbridqe Hanecy, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1908.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justioe Adams

delivered the opinion of the court.

Counsel for appellant admit that the evidence as to the merits is conflicting, and confine their argument to objections to instructions given at appellee’s request, and to the objection that the sum assessed as damages is excessive, thereby waiving the questions of appellee’s care and appellant’s negligence. Gordon v. Commissioners, etc., 169 Ill. 510; Keyes v. Kimmel, 186 Ill. 109; Inter-State Bldg. & Loan Assn. v. Ayers, 71 Ill. App. 520, 541.

The following are the instructions which appellant’s counsel claim to be erroneous, in the order…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chicago City Railway Co. v. BundyIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. North Chicago Street Railroad v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Chicago City Railway Co. v. MeadIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Keyes v. KimmelIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. North Chicago Street Railroad v. WellnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kelleher v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API