Legal Opinion

Chicago City Railway Co. v. Mead

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1903PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the Branch Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

Appellee was a passenger on a west-bound Sixty-third street car belonging to appellant, in the evening of June 28,1900. The car had crossed Cottage Grove avenue and had stopped at the west side of the street when an eastbound car collided with it. It was an open car with reversible seats, and appellee, seeing there was about to be a collision, arose in her seat. When the collision occurred she was thrown forward against the back of the seat in front of her and then back to the seat upon which she had been sitting. She brought this suit in the superior court of Cook county to recover damages…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. MeechIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. WarnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. HeinrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sixby v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Bobalek v. AtlassAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  3. Gilbert v. LloydAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  4. Sauter v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  5. Chicago & Alton Railway Co. v. JenningsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API