Legal Opinion
Amatangelo v. Schultz
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 10, 2005No. 03-CV-288PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Following an automobile accident, appel-lee Mary Schultz filed a negligence action, seeking damages for her personal injuries, against appellants Gina Amatangelo (the driver of the other car) and Vincent Ama-tangelo (the owner of the other car). 1 Before trial, the parties entered into an agreement 2 which provided (1) that if the Amatangelos were found liable and the jury awarded less than $20,000, Ms. Schultz would still receive a minimum of $20,000; (2) that if the Amatangelos were found liable and the jury awarded more than $300,000, Ms. Schultz would receive only…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Wallace v. Warehouse Employees Union No. 730District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Poire v. KaplanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re TyreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Clark v. ClarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bansda v. WheelerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- 2301 M Street Cooperative Association v. Chromium, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- MacCi v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- White v. SargentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005