Legal Opinion

American MacHine & Tool Co. v. Strite-Anderson Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 1984No. C1-83-1205, C3-83-1206 and C4-81-691PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

American Machine and Tool Company sued Strite-Anderson Manufacturing Company to recover for dies and inserts purchased by Strite-Anderson. Strite-Ander-sori counterclaimed for damages for nondelivery or late delivery. The jury found for American Machine on its claim and against Strite-Anderson on the counterclaim.

Strite-Anderson moved for judgment not withstanding the verdict on the issue of American Machine’s liability on the counterclaim and for a new trial on damages. Alternatively, Strite-Anderson sought a new trial on all issues. The trial court denied the motions.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Cameron v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Columbia Nitrogen Corporation v. Royster CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  4. Hanrahan v. Safway Steel Scaffold Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Cobb v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. C-Thru Container Corp. v. Midland Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  2. Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. Mills-Winfield Engineering Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Nordale, Inc. v. Samsco, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
  4. Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Danielson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API