City of New Orleans v. Grosch
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentRegan, Judge
After a careful analysis of the majority opinion of this court, I am compelled to respectfully dissent therefrom.
My conclusion is that the problem raised by the plea of unconstitutionality filed for the first time in this Court is the proper subject matter for a new suit and not the resuscitation of the present one by virtue of remanding it to the district court.
I am also compelled to dissent because the rationalization employed by the majority opinion in reaching its conclusion leads only to several legal dilemmas, which do violence to fundamental principles of law immaculately conceived in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Allopathic State Board of Medical Examiners v. FowlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
- Veasey v. PetersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- State Ex Rel. Holcombe v. City of Lake CharlesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Bayou Rapides Lumber Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Cox v. Acme Land & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.