Legal Opinion

Bell v. Architectural Woodwork, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided January 19, 2021No. 4:18-cv-00496Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION RENEE BELL, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 4:18-CV-496 NAB ) ARCHITECTURAL WOODWORK, INC., ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 49.) The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (Doc. 13.) For the following reasons, the Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment. I. Procedural Background…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Commissioner v. GroetzingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. City of Mt. Pleasant, Iowa v. Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. Central Electric Power Cooperative Northeast Missouri Electric Power Cooperative Tri-County Electric Cooperative Association MacOn Electric Cooperative and Ralls County Electric Cooperative, City of Mt. Pleasant, Iowa v. Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. Central Electric Power Cooperative Northeast Missouri Electric Power Cooperative Tri-County Electric Cooperative Association MacOn Electric Cooperative and Ralls County Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API