Legal Opinion

Scher v. Pollack

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

Section 327 of the Civil Practice Act provides in substance, that, where a party to an action voluntarily (see Schmoll Fils Associated v. Baltic America Line, 231 App. Div. 231) makes reference in his pleadings or affidavits to a document, any other party to the action may serve notice to produce such document for inspection and copy. The prescribed penalty imposed by the statute upon a party not complying with the notice is that he shall not thereafter “ be at liberty to put any such document in evidence on his behalf in such cause or matter, unless he shall satisfy the court * * * *857that he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burgin v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  2. Schmoll Fils Associated, Inc. v. Baltic America Line, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. Wile v. Nassau Smelting & Refining Works, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  4. Liggett v. Comprodaily Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Farber v. J. Chein & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API