Legal Opinion

Wile v. Nassau Smelting & Refining Works, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 1, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAvor, J.:

By the order now here the learned justice at Special Term refused to vacate plaintiff’s notice served on defendant under section 327 of the Civil Practice Act, and directed exhibition of the documents in question on a day certain. That notice, following the section mentioned, requires defendant to produce for inspection certain papers and letters referred to in affidavits of the defendant in a motion for a preference, which papers and letters are the basis of complete defenses theretofore interposed, and are referred to in the said affidavits as receipts in full and acknowledgments…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Waxman v. WilliamsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Williams v. Edward DeV. Tompkins, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Norwich Pharmacal Co. v. BarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  4. Fener v. Brewster Aeronautical Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Scher v. PollackNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API