Farber v. J. Chein & Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
This action was brought to recover royalties allegedly due under a claimed written agreement dated September 15,1936, referred to in the complaint. In pursuance *159of section 327 of the Civil Practice Act, defendant served notice upon plaintiff to produce the original agreement for defendant’s inspection. Plaintiff did not move with respect to the notice. (See Scher v. Pollack, 10 Misc 2d 856.) Nor did he comply with it. Defendant moved to preclude. By order of November 7,1956, Mr. Justice Lynch precluded plaintiff from proving the alleged agreement or from offering any evidence of the contents…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Grobman v. FreimanNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Silverman v. Rogers Imports, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
- Scher v. PollackNew York Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hummel v. HummelNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Caivana v. SpohnNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- W. R. Simmons & Associates Research, Inc. v. Ziff-Davis Publishing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
- Farber v. J. Chein & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960