Legal Opinion

Richardson-Tunnell v. Schools Insurance Program for Employees

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 2007No. B195938PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COFFEE, J.

Klare Richardson-Tunnell appeals from a judgment of dismissal after an order granting judgment on the pleadings in favor of Schools Insurance Program for Employees (SIPE) and Lucia Mar Unified School District (District), each public entities. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438.) In the course of an investigation into Richardson-Tunnell’s workers’ compensation claim, SIPE and the District videotaped her at her wedding, at the wedding reception, and during her honeymoon.

The trial court found that her claims were barred by governmental investigatory immunity (Gov. Code, § 821.6), 1 and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. Hillsides, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Quigley v. Garden Valley Fire Protection Dist.California Supreme Court · 2019
  3. San Mateo Union High School District v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Catsouras v. Department of California Highway PatrolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API