Legal Opinion
State v. Marro
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 2, 2002No. AC 21873; AC 21876; AC 22251; AC 22252PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
In this matter involving two consolidated writs of error and two consolidated appeals, the plaintiff state of Connecticut appeals, in AC 21873 and in AC 21876, from the judgments of the trial court granting two motions for rebate filed by the depositor of cash bail following the recapture of the fugitive defendant, Mario Marro.1 In AC 22251 and in AC 22252, the state filed separate writs of error, challenging the propriety of the court’s orders. The state claims that the court improperly determined that the depositor was entitled to a rebate on forfeited bail bonds where the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. AyalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. VaughanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Texas-Ohio Power, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Mello v. Superior CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Querubin v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Chadha v. Charlotte Hungerford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Evans v. Plan & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. One or More Persons Over Whom Court's Jurisdiction Has Not Yet Been InvokedConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.