Liberty Cable Co., Inc. v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PRESKA, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Liberty Cable Co., Inc. (“Liberty”), Sixty Sutton Corp. (“Sixty Sutton”), and Jack A. Veerman seek, inter alia, a declaratory judgment that 47 U.S.C. §§ 522(7) and 541(b) are unconstitutional. Before me now is their motion for a preliminary injunction against agencies and officials of New York State (the “State”) and the City of New York (the “City”) and defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. For the reasons stated below, the complaint is dismissed as to certain claims and, as to the remainder, plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction is…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hachamovitch v. DeBuonoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- HACHAMOVITCH v. DeBUONOCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Tri-Star Pictures, Inc. v. UngerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Duane Reade, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Standard Investment Chartered, Inc. v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.