Legal Opinion

USX Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 1992No. 1685 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, President Judge.

USX Corporation appeals a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board affirming a decision of a referee concerning subrogation rights of USX to a third-party settlement secured by Mildred Backos, widow of claimant Rudolph Backos. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

*61The issues in this case are whether the referee and board (1) properly calculated USX’s grace period, (2) erred in ordering USX to pay its proportionate share of costs to the claimant’s widow over the grace period, (3) erred in ordering USX to continue to pay to claimant’s widow attorney’s fees owed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Dasconio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Warner Lambert Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. CNA Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Baus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Darr Construction Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Whitmoyer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. C.M. Whitmoyer v. WCAB (Mountain Country Meats)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API