Clampitt v. A.M.R. Corp.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion
ON DENIAL OF PETITION FOR REHEARING
2DissentBistline, Justice
PREFACE
There is likely little to be gained by re-plowing the same ground. Nevertheless, I feel constrained to make a final effort at pointing out exactly where the majority is taking the law and how erroneously it gets there. The majority today is making a drastic change in the law of vendor-vendee. Time will soon demonstrate that it is bad law which wil1 lead to an increase in litigation and Produce unjust results not ever contemplated by litigating parties as evidenced by their written contracts.
As I have on many occasions conceded, any day that three…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Graves v. CupicIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Anderson v. MichelIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Brooks v. JensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Stewart v. Salisbury Realty & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Houchin v. Braham Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.