Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Iron Co. v. Hoadley

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island

Decided March 30, 1907No. 2,785PublishedCited by 3 opinions

At Raw. On demurrer to declaration.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

The first point on demurrer is to the effect that the declaration does not sufficiently allege the making of a contract between the defendant and the Corliss Steam Engine Company. The declaration alleges a conveyance of real estate by the Corliss Company to the defendant, “upon his express promise and agreement as to the consideration for said conveyance to him that he, the said Alfred H. Hoadley, should thereafter pay the,plaintiff and said other creditors of said Corliss Steam Engine Company 50 per cent, of the amount of their said claims and judgments against said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ober v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Rodenbarger v. BramblettIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Wood v. MoriartySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1887
  4. Munroe v. Providence Permanent Firemens' Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1896
  5. Phenix Iron Foundry v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal Surety Co. v. Minneapolis Steel & MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. Gibson v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1916
  3. Federal Surety Co. v. City of Staunton ex rel. McWane Cast Iron Pipe Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API