Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Rose

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 2006No. 04CA2160PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussel, J.

James L. Rose (husband) appeals from the trial court’s temporary orders awarding Karen Lee Rose (wife) maintenance and requiring him to advance her anticipated attorney fees and costs. We affirm.

Wife filed a petition to dissolve the parties’ twenty-five-year marriage. She filed a motion for temporary orders, requesting (1) maintenance and (2) attorney fees and costs.

In support of her request for fees and costs, wife explained that the ease involved assets worth millions of dollars. Because many these assets came from husband’s parents, the litigation would center on determin ing the value of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Neidlinger v. NeidlingerKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re the Marriage of HuffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Marriage of Svetich v. SvetichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. In Re the Marriage of LeeColorado Court of Appeals · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of IkelerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. of Thorstad —Colorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. In Re Marriage of ThornhillColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. In Re the Marriage of IkelerColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. In Re the Marriage of IkelerColorado Court of Appeals · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API