Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Mahoney

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 2, 2009No. 08 Civ. 3306(CM)(DCF)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ CROSS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

McMAHON, District Judge.

Defendants move to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint. Plaintiffs oppose the motion, and cross-move for leave to amend, attaching a proposed amended complaint.

An order disposing of these motions issued on March 31. Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend was granted. However, because both their original and amended pleadings failed to state claims under the civil RICO statute or antitrust laws, defendants’ motion to dismiss Counts…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bizzie Walters v. Todd McMahenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  2. Lundy v. Catholic Health System of Long Island Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. Edwards v. Prime, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Dejesus v. HF Management Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  5. DeSilva v. North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API