Legal Opinion

Ehrhart v. Mahony

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 4, 1919No. Civ. No. 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

On September 27, 1910, the parties to the action entered into a written agreement denominated "Contract for Deed,” whereby the plaintiffs agreed to sell and the defendants agreed to purchase three certain quartz mining claims in Calaveras County for the sum of three thousand dollars, payable in installments, and defendants agreed to do all assessment work on said claims from the date of said contract. Defendants paid the first installment of fifty dollars, but made no further payments, and they notified plaintiffs that they refused to carry out said contract or to pay any further…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sparks v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. White v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Ehrhart v. MahonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burrow v. TimmsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. O'Donnell v. LutterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Boro v. RuzichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Boulenger v. MorisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Vineland Homes, Inc. v. BarishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API