Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Diehl v. O'MALLEY

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 28, 2003No. SC 84659PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL A. WOLFF, Judge.

Does Missouri’s constitutional guarantee of a right to jury trial apply to an action for damages under the Missouri Human Rights Act?. Kathleen Diehl, plaintiff in the circuit court and relator here, seeks actual and punitive damages against her former employer, NASD Regulation, Inc. Her petition, which seeks damages only and not equitable relief, is based upon the human rights act’s provisions prohibiting discrimination on the basis of age, sex, and retaliation for filing a charge of discrimination. Actual damages pleaded include lost wages and emotional distress.

Diehl…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Dred Scott v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  4. Mahoney v. Doerhoff Surgical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. Demay v. Liberty Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Daugherty v. City of Maryland HeightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  2. Sanders v. AhmedSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  3. McElroy v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. Nitro Distributing, Inc. v. DunnSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  5. Watts ex rel. Watts v. Lester E. Cox Medical CentersSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API