Legal Opinion
Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
California Supreme Court
Decided January 12, 2005No. S112862PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
21 Cal.Rptr.3d 331 (2004)
34 Cal.4th 553
101 P.3d 140
Robert GRAHAM et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,
v.
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendants and Appellants.
No. S112862.
Supreme Court of California.
December 2, 2004.
As Modified January 12, 2005.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., DoHoang T. Duong, Los Angeles, Gregory D. Brown, Oakland, Dominic Lanza, Los Angeles; Bryan Cave, Sheldon Eisenberg, Santa Monica, Charles A. Newman, John W. Rogers, Walnut Creek; Robert E. Norton II and Mary E. Waldrup for Defendants and Appellants.
Somach, Simmons & Dunn, Timothy M. Taylor, Nicholas A.…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Laffitte v. Robert Half International Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
- Robinson v. City of ChowchillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011